Team Intelligence · AFC East · 2026 preseason

Josh Allen Costs a Fortune. Buffalo's Other Fantasy Points Do Not.

The model forecasts a top-10 scoring offense — 28.3 points a game, 1st — with its best fantasy real estate at running back (2nd), and the market is still buying it as the 17th offense to own, 13 places behind where the model has it. Comparable offenses have supported 3.6 fantasy starters.

ADY
Auto Draft Years
17 August 2026 · 9 min read
28.3
proj points/game (1st)
3.6
expected fantasy starters
RB 2nd
relative strength
+13
market vs model, in places

The short version

  • Buffalo went 12–5 in 2025 while leading the NFL in rushing yards, rushing yards per game and rushing TDs.
  • James Cook won the rushing title with 1,621 yards, while Buffalo's pass rate fell to 48.2%.
  • Shakir led the team with only 719 receiving yards; no Bills receiver reached 800.
  • Buffalo added DJ Moore, while Joe Brady moved from OC to head coach and will continue calling plays.
  • The model still projects 28.3 PPG, first in the NFL, but expects pass rate to rebound to 53.7%.
  • Similar historical offenses produced 3.6 fantasy starters, versus 2.6 overall.
  • The market values Buffalo's roster 21st and the model has it 9th, a 12-place gap that makes this roster underpriced.
  • Allen and Cook are fairly priced. Moore and Kincaid are interesting but don't clear the buy thresholds.
  • Khalil Shakir does: WR57 market, WR22 model, +31 adjusted edge.
  • Watch pass rate in September. If Buffalo really moves back toward 54%, there should be considerably more receiving production available.
  • The Buffalo bet isn't paying more for Josh Allen. It's buying the fantasy points the market seems to think disappear after he creates them.

Fantasy managers are not exactly keeping Josh Allen a secret.

He is QB1 by the market. Pick 25 overall.

We have reached the stage of the relationship where nobody needs to pretend this is casual anymore.

And then something strange happens.

The market values Buffalo as only the 21st-most valuable fantasy roster.

The AutoDraftYears model has it 9th.

Apparently fantasy managers believe Josh Allen is one of the most valuable players alive while remaining deeply suspicious of almost everyone who catches or carries the football next to him.

Which gives Buffalo a much more interesting question than Is Josh Allen good?

If the Bills keep producing one of football's best offenses, where are all the other fantasy points going?

What happened in 2025? Buffalo became a running team

Buffalo went 12–5 in 2025 and made the playoffs for the seventh consecutive season.

Nothing particularly alarming there.

The surprising part was how they did it.

The Bills finished first in the NFL in rushing yards, rushing yards per game and rushing touchdowns, piling up 2,714 yards on the ground. James Cook won the NFL rushing title with 1,621 yards, averaged 5.2 yards per carry and scored 12 rushing touchdowns.

Josh Allen was still Josh Allen.

But the offense around him increasingly looked like someone had purchased a Ferrari and decided the safest way to preserve the engine was using it primarily for Costco trips.

Allen threw for 3,668 yards and 25 touchdowns, well below the passing volume we've grown accustomed to seeing attached to Buffalo. The Bills threw on only 48.2% of their offensive snaps.

And the receiving production followed.

Khalil Shakir led Buffalo with only 719 receiving yards.

Dalton Kincaid was second with 571.

Nobody reached 800.

That's the important part of the 2025 story.

Buffalo did not become a worse offense.

It became a different offense.

Joe Brady leaned into the running game, Cook had the best season of his career, and the Bills won 12 games without requiring Allen to spend every Sunday throwing 42 passes into increasingly desperate coverage.

From a real-football perspective?

Hard to argue.

From a fantasy perspective?

Slightly inconvenient if you drafted a Buffalo receiver hoping Allen would personally escort him to 1,300 yards.

Buffalo Bills: scoring, pass rate and volume, 2021–2026
Solid line is points per game against the left axis; dashed lines are pass rate (right axis) and snaps from scrimmage.
The 2026 point on each line is the model's forecast, not an actual.

And now Buffalo has changed the equation again

The Bills did not respond to that receiver production by saying, This seems fine.

They traded a second-round pick to Chicago for DJ Moore, who joins Shakir and Kincaid in the passing game. Moore has surpassed 1,100 receiving yards four times in his career and reunites with Brady, who coached him in Carolina.

Brady himself is also moving.

After two seasons as Buffalo's offensive coordinator, he replaced Sean McDermott as head coach in January. More importantly for our purposes, Brady has said he intends to continue calling the offensive plays.

So this isn't a brand-new offensive system.

But the personnel suggests Buffalo would probably like the passing game to become more than Josh Allen occasionally checking whether anyone is open before handing the ball to Cook again.

That's exactly where the model lands.

The model expects the same scoring with more passing

Buffalo scored 28.3 points per game in 2025.

The 2026 projection:

28.3.

First in the NFL.

No rebound required.

This offense has been doing approximately this forever, or at least long enough that I have forgotten what Sunday afternoons felt like before Josh Allen scored fantasy points.

The meaningful changes are underneath the scoring projection:

Metric20252026 Model
Points/Game28.328.3
Pass Rate48.2%53.7%
Snaps/Game62.064.3
Red-Zone Trips3.83.7
2025 to 2026
Where the forecast moves
Percentage change against last season's actuals.
Bars are the forecast's own movement; the roster changes above are what the model is responding to.

That 5.5-point increase in pass rate is the entire hinge.

Because the positional environments are already excellent:

  • QB: 5th
  • RB: 2nd
  • WR: 5th
  • TE: 5th
Position environment
Buffalo Bills 2026 grades by position
Bars are inverted league rank, so taller is better. Green is top-10, red is bottom-10.
An environment grade is a thumb on the scale for a close call, not a ranking of the players in it.

Buffalo's worst fantasy environment is fifth.

A terrible hardship.

Offensive pie against opportunity concentration
Buffalo — large pie, distributed
Horizontal: how many fantasy points this offense has to give out. Vertical: how tightly its projected points sit on its top two skill players.
Small pieconcentratedLarge pieconcentratedSmall piedistributedLarge piedistributedBUF
56% of this offense's projected skill points sit on its top two players, against a league median of 63%. Worth being precise about what this axis does: across 320 historical team-seasons concentration has almost no relationship with how many fantasy starters an offense produces (r = −0.07). The size of the pie decides how many; concentration only decides who.

History says there should be more than Allen and Cook

The 30 historical offenses most similar to Buffalo's 2026 projection produced 3.6 fantasy starters on average.

Across all 320 team-seasons in the AutoDraftYears sample?

2.6.

Comparable teams produced:

Fantasy OutcomeHit Rate
Top-12 QB70%
Two Top-24 RBs90%
Three Top-36 WRs90%
Top-12 TE50%
3.6
expected fantasy starters
Bear3
Base4
Bull4

Read off the 30 most similar offenses in 2016–2025, not asserted. A starter is a QB1, an RB2, a WR3 or a TE1 — top 12, 24, 36 and 12 at the position. Across all 320 team-seasons the average offense produced 2.6.

The model's reasonable expectation is roughly three fantasy starters in a bad outcome and four in the base or bull case.

Which makes the market's 21st-place team valuation difficult to reconcile. The model has the same roster 9th. That is a 12-place gap, comfortably past the eight-place bar where the model stops treating a disagreement as noise and starts calling a roster underpriced.

Not because Josh Allen is underpriced.

He absolutely is not.

Because somebody besides Allen and Cook should benefit from an offense this large.

And that's where the draft board gets interesting

PlayerADPMarketModelAdjusted EdgeCall
James Cook12RB7RB6+2Fair Price
Josh Allen25QB1QB6-4Fair Price
DJ Moore58WR26WR17+4Fair Price
Dalton Kincaid124TE14TE8+4Fair Price
Khalil Shakir132WR57WR22+31Buy
Ray Davis190RB64RB106—Thin Market
PlayerADPMarketModelEdgePPGRoleRiskCall
James CookRB10RB5RB601482LowFAIR PRICE
Josh AllenQB28QB1QB6-62171LowFADE
DJ MooreWR54WR25WR17+5973LowFAIR PRICE
Dalton KincaidTE124TE12TE8+31070LowFAIR PRICE
Khalil ShakirWR131WR55WR22+301066LowBUY
Ray DavisRB191RB60RB106—338LowTHIN MARKET

Market and Model are ranks within the position. Edge is the model's position rank against the market's, after removing the drift that affects every player at that price — so it reads as “the model likes him this many places more than it likes the typical player who costs this much.” A call needs the edge to clear the position's bar (QB 5, RB 15, WR 11, TE 5 places), set at two-thirds of that position's own spread.

Model against market
Disagreement, in position places
Bars are the de-drifted edge — the same number the calls in the table are made from.

This is my favorite kind of team disagreement.

The model is much more bullish on Buffalo than the market.

But it isn't getting there by declaring Josh Allen cheap.

Allen is market QB1.

The model ranks him QB6.

James Cook?

RB7 versus model RB6.

Perfectly reasonable.

Fantasy managers have successfully identified the two most obvious Buffalo players.

Congratulations to all involved.

The discount begins farther down.

Khalil Shakir is the actual Buffalo bet

Shakir goes around pick 132 as WR57.

The model ranks him WR22.

That's already a ridiculous-looking gap.

After adjusting for the normal amount of ranking chaos that exists around pick 132, Shakir still owns a +31 positional edge.

The WR buy threshold is 11.

He did not sneak over it.

He drove through it.

And Shakir isn't some player we're projecting from three good preseason routes and a training-camp quote involving the word explosive.

He led Buffalo in receiving in 2025.

Yes, the total was only 719 yards.

That's the point.

He led a passing game that barely passed.

Now the model expects Buffalo's pass rate to rise from 48.2% to 53.7%, while still projecting the Bills as the league's highest-scoring offense.

I don't need Shakir to become an alpha receiver.

At WR57, I need him to remain involved while the passing pie gets larger.

That's a much easier bet.

DJ Moore complicates it — but not enough

Obviously, Moore matters.

Buffalo did not spend a second-round pick on him so he could provide leadership during hydration breaks. The Bills acquired an established receiver who has topped 1,100 yards repeatedly, and he enters camp as one of Allen's most accomplished outside weapons in years.

The model likes him too.

Market: WR26.

Model: WR17.

But after adjusting for price, his edge falls to only +4.

That is the difference between liking a player and finding a price worth attacking.

Moore may lead Buffalo in receiving.

Shakir can still be the better fantasy purchase.

Those statements are allowed to coexist.

Fantasy football occasionally permits nuance, usually when nobody is looking.

Allen and Cook are exactly what premium players look like

There is nothing wrong with drafting Josh Allen.

There is also nothing wrong with James Cook.

Cook just won the rushing title. Buffalo led the league in rushing. The model ranks the Bills second at running back and Cook RB6.

That's excellent.

It's also RB7 pricing.

Allen is even simpler.

QB1 market.

QB6 model.

Pick 25.

You're buying the penthouse.

Maybe the view is incredible.

Nobody forgot to include it in the listing.

BUY
Khalil Shakir
Khalil Shakir is priced at pick 131 (WR55); the model has him WR22. What fired: the model has him 30 places higher at the position than his price implies, a 5th-ranked WR environment behind him, a low risk grade and a market price outside the top 100.
FAIR PRICE
James Cook
James Cook is priced at pick 10 (RB5); the model has him RB6. What fired: the model and the market land within a few position places of each other, a projected role scoring 82 of 100, a 2nd-ranked RB environment behind him and a low risk grade.
FADE
Josh Allen
Josh Allen is priced at pick 28 (QB1); the model has him QB6. What fired: the market pays for 6 position places more than the model gives him. Cutting against it: a 5th-ranked QB environment behind him and a low risk grade.

The number that decides this argument

Pass rate.

Not Buffalo's record.

Not Josh Allen's touchdown total.

Not whether Shakir catches a 52-yard touchdown in Week 2 and suddenly becomes the waiver-wire analyst on everyone's television.

Pass rate.

Buffalo threw on 48.2% of its snaps in 2025.

The model expects 53.7%.

That doesn't sound like a dramatic difference until you apply five extra percentage points of passing to one of football's highest-scoring offenses.

More Allen attempts.

More targets.

More chances for Moore, Shakir and Kincaid to coexist.

If Buffalo is still sitting below 50% through September, I become less excited about the receiving values.

If they're around 54%?

Then the model's 3.6-starter projection starts looking considerably easier to reach.

So how should we draft Buffalo?

Don't interpret a bullish Bills projection as permission to draft Josh Allen at any price.

The market already understands Allen.

It understands Cook.

And after the Moore trade, it largely understands Moore too.

The actual disagreement is farther down the board.

Khalil Shakir at WR57 is the cleanest way to bet that Buffalo's passing game gets even slightly larger.

That is what the team-level model is useful for.

Not telling us Josh Allen plays in a good offense.

I had managed to piece that together.

It's telling us that an offense projected to score the most points in football probably shouldn't have its leading 2025 receiver sitting around until pick 132.

Fantasy managers are paying handsomely for the privilege of drafting Josh Allen.

I'll take one of the guys he throws to.

Was this useful?

Sources: Auto Draft Years FF Model workbook — Team Data By Year, Team Stat Ranking, 2026 Team Context; Auto Draft Years 2026 consensus board (16 authoritative market sources); Player outcomes 2016–2025, Pro Football Reference via the project dataset. Team environment grades, forecasts and player model ranks are proprietary. Every figure on this page is generated from the dataset at build time; none is typed in by hand.