Team Intelligence · AFC East · 2026 preseason

Miami Has One Fantasy Superstar and a Lot of Questions Standing Behind Him

The model forecasts a middle-of-the-league offense — 23.0 points a game, 16th — with its best fantasy real estate at quarterback (18th), and the market has it priced about right — the two disagree by 2 places, inside the bar this series sets before calling anything mispriced. Comparable offenses have supported 2.7 fantasy starters.

ADY
Auto Draft Years
17 August 2026 · 9 min read
23.0
proj points/game (16th)
2.7
expected fantasy starters
QB 18th
relative strength
+2
market vs model, in places

The short version

  • Miami finished 7–10, 25th in scoring, and the McDaniel/Tua/Hill/Waddle era effectively ended.
  • Achane still produced 1,838 yards from scrimmage and led the NFL at 5.7 yards per carry.
  • Miami now has a new head coach, new starting quarterback and almost completely rebuilt receiving corps.
  • AutoDraftYears projects only 23.0 PPG and ranks the RB environment 24th.
  • Despite that, Achane is RB1 in the model versus RB8 in the market.
  • His +8 edge doesn't technically qualify as a buy, but I'm comfortable paying the current price.
  • Fade Malik Willis at QB22 versus QB41 in the model.
  • Don't force a receiver sleeper. The model isn't giving us one.
  • Watch offensive volume and pass rate in September.
  • Miami isn't the fantasy bet. Achane is.

NFL rebuilds are usually a polite request for fantasy managers to leave the premises.

New quarterback. New coach. Receivers disappear. Everyone starts talking about “building a culture,” which is generally not a statistic I can put into a lineup.

Miami did basically all of it.

Tua Tagovailoa is gone. Tyreek Hill is gone. Jaylen Waddle is gone. Mike McDaniel is gone.

And somehow AutoDraftYears looks at what remains and says:

De'Von Achane is RB1.

Not RB8 with upside.

RB1.

So the interesting question in Miami isn't whether the Dolphins will be good.

It's how much should a bad environment matter when the individual player might be exceptional enough to ignore it?

2025: The McDaniel era ran out of runway

It is easy to forget how quickly the Dolphins went from terrifying to ordinary.

In 2023, Miami scored 27.9 points per game.

By 2025, that had fallen to 20.4.

The Dolphins finished 7–10, missed the playoffs for a second straight season and started an alarming 1–6 before briefly reviving the year. They later climbed back into the fringe playoff conversation, but the recovery couldn't save the regime. Miami fired Mike McDaniel after the season, finishing his four-year tenure 35–33.

The offense finished 25th in scoring and 26th in yards.

And there wasn't one neat explanation.

Tyreek Hill suffered a dislocated knee with multiple torn ligaments in Week 4 and missed the rest of the season. He finished with only 21 catches for 265 yards and one touchdown.

Tua Tagovailoa's season went the other direction.

He stayed healthy enough to play 14 games but threw a career-high 15 interceptions against 20 touchdowns. After a Week 15 loss to Pittsburgh, McDaniel benched him. Rookie Quinn Ewers started the final three games.

The offense that once seemed built from pure speed had reached the “maybe we should reorganize the garage” phase.

Then Achane did something inconvenient.

He was excellent.

Miami Dolphins: scoring, pass rate and volume, 2021–2026
Solid line is points per game against the left axis; dashed lines are pass rate (right axis) and snaps from scrimmage.
The 2026 point on each line is the model's forecast, not an actual.

Achane became the offense

Achane rushed for 1,350 yards on 238 carries, led the NFL at 5.7 yards per carry, caught another 67 passes for 488 yards, and finished with 1,838 yards from scrimmage.

Miami voted him its team MVP.

He accounted for more than one-third of the Dolphins' offensive touchdowns and scrimmage yards entering Week 18.

That's the part of 2025 I want carrying into the fantasy discussion.

Achane wasn't productive because Miami's offense was humming.

It wasn't.

He produced while the offense was actively coming apart.

There is a difference.

Then Miami tore down the rest

The 2026 Dolphins barely resemble the offense that entered last season.

Hill was released after failing his physical. Tua was released. Waddle, who led Miami with 910 receiving yards in 2025, was traded to Denver for a package headlined by a first-round pick.

Miami hired former Packers defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley as head coach and promoted Bobby Slowik from senior passing game coordinator to offensive coordinator.

And the new quarterback is Malik Willis, signed in free agency after spending the previous two seasons in Green Bay.

This is not a retool.

This is the Dolphins putting the old offense on Facebook Marketplace.

Which makes the AutoDraftYears forecast surprisingly restrained.

The model expects… normal

Miami projects for:

  • 23.0 points per game, 16th in the NFL
  • 58.7% pass rate, up from 52.6%
  • 57.9 snaps per game, up from 53.6
2025 to 2026
Where the forecast moves
Percentage change against last season's actuals.
Bars are the forecast's own movement; the roster changes above are what the model is responding to.

The positional environments aren't impressive:

PositionEnvironment Rank
QB18th
RB24th
WR18th
TE19th
Position environment
Miami Dolphins 2026 grades by position
Bars are inverted league rank, so taller is better. Green is top-10, red is bottom-10.
An environment grade is a thumb on the scale for a close call, not a ranking of the players in it.

There isn't a hidden offensive juggernaut here.

The model has Miami's fantasy roster 32nd. So does the market.

Essentially: yes, everyone sees the rebuild.

Offensive pie against opportunity concentration
Miami — mid-sized pie, concentrated
Horizontal: how many fantasy points this offense has to give out. Vertical: how tightly its projected points sit on its top two skill players.
Small pieconcentratedLarge pieconcentratedSmall piedistributedLarge piedistributedMIA
100% of this offense's projected skill points sit on its top two players, against a league median of 63%. Worth being precise about what this axis does: across 320 historical team-seasons concentration has almost no relationship with how many fantasy starters an offense produces (r = −0.07). The size of the pie decides how many; concentration only decides who.

Historical comps say much the same thing.

The 30 offenses most similar to Miami's forecast averaged 2.7 fantasy starters, almost identical to the 2.6 average across all 320 team-seasons in the AutoDraftYears sample.

2.7
expected fantasy starters
Bear2
Base3
Bull3

Read off the 30 most similar offenses in 2016–2025, not asserted. A starter is a QB1, an RB2, a WR3 or a TE1 — top 12, 24, 36 and 12 at the position. Across all 320 team-seasons the average offense produced 2.6.

This should be a normal-to-bad fantasy ecosystem.

And then there's Achane.

Achane is the exception to almost everything above

Current price:

RB8. Pick 14.

AutoDraftYears:

RB1.

Projected PPG: 20.

Role score: 82.

Risk: Low.

Adjusted edge: +8.

That edge doesn't reach the model's official RB buy threshold of +13.

I'm not changing the rule because RB1 looks fun in bold type.

But this may be my favorite non-buy on the board.

Because think about what the model is doing.

It ranks Miami's RB environment 24th.

It thinks the overall roster is one of the least valuable in football.

It expects basically league-average scoring.

And after absorbing all of that, it still prefers Achane to every other running back.

That is a much stronger statement than simply projecting a talented player in a good offense.

The environment is actively fighting him.

He's winning anyway.

I'm comfortable paying RB8 prices.

If he falls past that? Now I'm getting aggressive.

PlayerADPMarketModelEdgePPGRoleRiskCall
De'Von AchaneRB14RB8RB1+82082LowGOOD PLAYER, BAD ROOM
Malik WillisQB151QB21QB41—1260LowTHIN MARKET
Malik WashingtonWR178WR67WR162—655MediumTHIN MARKET
Chris BellWR229WR89WR210——49MediumTHIN MARKET
Tyreek HillWR238WR88WR32—1165MediumTHIN MARKET
Jaylen WrightRB242RB74RB140—439MediumTHIN MARKET

Market and Model are ranks within the position. Edge is the model's position rank against the market's, after removing the drift that affects every player at that price — so it reads as “the model likes him this many places more than it likes the typical player who costs this much.” A call needs the edge to clear the position's bar (QB 5, RB 15, WR 11, TE 5 places), set at two-thirds of that position's own spread.

Model against market
Disagreement, in position places
Bars are the de-drifted edge — the same number the calls in the table are made from.

Malik Willis is where I disagree with the market

Willis is almost the mirror image.

Market:

QB22.

Model:

QB41.

Adjusted edge:

-22.

The quarterback fade threshold is -7.

Willis did play extremely efficient football in limited action for Green Bay before signing with Miami, and his rushing ability gives him an obvious fantasy path. Miami's coaching staff has also emphasized using that mobility rather than pretending he's suddenly a stationary pocket passer.

I understand the appeal.

I don't like the price.

Miami's QB environment ranks 18th, his projected role is only 60, and the model sees 12 PPG.

QB22 isn't expensive in absolute terms.

But quarterback is deep enough that “not expensive” isn't the same thing as “worth drafting.”

I'm letting someone else chase this one.

NO BUY
Nobody clears the bar
The closest is De'Von Achane at +8 position places, short of the threshold. Forcing a buy here would be the template writing, not the model.
NO FADE
Nothing here is overpriced
No player on this roster is priced far enough ahead of the model to call a fade.

The receiver room is mostly a dartboard

This is also where the current Miami page needs to change the most.

There is no Tyreek Hill fantasy case anymore. There is no Waddle case.

The current room includes Malik Washington, Tutu Atwell, Jalen Tolbert and a collection of younger options including rookie Chris Bell.

Washington is the most interesting holdover. Slowik has specifically discussed the work Willis and Washington have put in together and Washington's improvement as a route runner during camp.

But the model has Washington only WR166 against a thin-market WR70 price.

Chris Bell sits even lower at WR214.

This isn't where I need to manufacture a sleeper because every team page is legally required to contain one.

Sometimes a wide receiver room is just a wide receiver room.

What could break the Achane argument?

Volume.

Not Achane's volume.

Miami's.

The Dolphins ran only 53.6 offensive snaps per game in the AutoDraftYears 2025 data.

The model needs that to climb to 57.9, while pass rate rises from 52.6% to 58.7%.

That's a meaningful philosophical change.

And I'm not completely sold on it.

Slowik has talked this summer about building a tough, physical offense and incorporating Willis as a runner. He has also retained some of the motion concepts Miami used under McDaniel.

So September matters.

If Miami is playing faster and throwing around 59% of the time, 23 points per game looks plausible.

If the Dolphins instead become a low-volume, quarterback-run-heavy offense?

The fantasy pie gets smaller quickly.

Achane can survive a small pie.

I don't particularly want anyone else fighting him for crumbs.

So what should fantasy managers do?

Draft Achane. Don't draft the Dolphins.

That's the distinction.

This isn't a bet on Miami rebounding.

It isn't a bet that Malik Willis secretly turns into an elite quarterback.

It definitely isn't a bet on the receiving corps.

It's a bet that Achane already proved something important in 2025:

The offense can fail without taking him down with it.

He produced 1,838 scrimmage yards while Miami finished 25th in scoring.

Now the model ranks him RB1 despite giving his running back environment a 24th-place grade.

Usually I want my early picks attached to good offenses.

Achane is the rare player making me wonder whether I've been asking the question backward.

Maybe we shouldn't ask whether Miami is good enough for Achane.

Maybe we should ask whether Achane is good enough that Miami barely matters.

Last year, he was.

Was this useful?

Sources: Auto Draft Years FF Model workbook — Team Data By Year, Team Stat Ranking, 2026 Team Context; Auto Draft Years 2026 consensus board (16 authoritative market sources); Player outcomes 2016–2025, Pro Football Reference via the project dataset. Team environment grades, forecasts and player model ranks are proprietary. Every figure on this page is generated from the dataset at build time; none is typed in by hand.